- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Free agency and materialism
In Daniel Howard-Snyder & Jeff Jordan (eds.), Faith, Freedom, and Rationality: Philosophy of Religion Today. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 47-72 (1996)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Faith, Freedom, and Rationality: Philosophy of Religion Today.Daniel Howard-Snyder & Jeff Jordan (eds.) - 1996 - Rowman & Littlefield.
JA Cover and John O'Leary-Hawthorne, Substance and Individuation in Leibniz Reviewed by.Karen Detlefsen - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22 (1):19-21.
Faith, Freedom, and Rationality: Philosophy of Religion Today.Eleonore Stump - 1996 - Lanham: Rowman &Amp; Littlefield.
In defense of 'the free will defense' response to Daniel Howard-Snyder and John O'Leary-Hawthorne.William L. Rowe - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 44 (2):115 - 120.
Faith, Freedom, and Rationality: Philosophy of Religion Today.Martin Curd - 1996 - Rowman & Littlefield.
Libertarian freedom and the principle of alternative possibilities.Eleonore Stump - 1996 - In Faith, Freedom, and Rationality: Philosophy of Religion Today. Lanham: Rowman &Amp; Littlefield. pp. 73-88.
Jeff Jordan and Daniel Howards-Snyder, eds., Faith, Freedom, and Rationality, Philosophy of Religion Today Reviewed by.Jerome I. Gellman - 1996 - Philosophy in Review 16 (5):355-357.
It is wrong, everywhere, always, and for anyone, to believe anything on insufficient evidence.Peter Inwagevann - 1996 - In Daniel Howard-Snyder & Jeff Jordan (eds.), Faith, Freedom, and Rationality: Philosophy of Religion Today. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 137-153.
It Is Wrong, Everywhere, Always, for Anyone, to Believe Anything upon Insufficient Evidence.Peter van Inwagen - 1996 - In Daniel Howard-Snyder & Jeff Jordan (eds.), Faith, Freedom, and Rationality: Philosophy of Religion Today. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 137-154.
Feminism, materialism, and freedom.Elizabeth Grosz - 2010 - In Diana Coole & Samantha Frost (eds.), New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Duke University Press. pp. 139-157.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
324 (#86,156)
6 months
69 (#86,456)
2009-01-28
Downloads
324 (#86,156)
6 months
69 (#86,456)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Is Incompatibilism Intuitive?Jason Turner, Eddy Nahmias, Stephen Morris & Thomas Nadelhoffer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):28-53.
Explaining Away Incompatibilist Intuitions.Dylan Murray & Eddy Nahmias - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):434-467.
Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: A test of the Expertise Defense.Eric Schulz, Edward T. Cokely & Adam Feltz - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1722-1731.
Intuitions About Free Will and the Failure to Comprehend Determinism.Thomas Nadelhoffer, Samuel Murray & Elise Dykhuis - 2023 - Erkenntnis 88 (6):2515-2536.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-ppxv8 uwo