“Colour science” and the autonomy of colour

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):185-185 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At the close of their searching critique, Saunders & van Brakel raise, but do not address, the question: There are two distinct traditions of colour research, one based on disembodied coloured lights and another on surface colour. The coherence and integrity of both these traditions are challenged by the nonautonomy of colour

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Semantics versus pragmatics in colour categorization.Nick Braisby & Bradley Franks - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):181-182.
The irrelevance of the psychophysical argument.Carl Simpson - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):207-207.
One machine among many.Barbara Saunders - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):969-970.
A monochrome view of colour.I. C. McManus - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):204-204.
Colour is a culturalist category.J. van Brakel - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):507-508.
Surface Colour is not a Perceptual Content.Damon Crockett - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (2):303-318.
Colour-cognition is more universal than colour-language.I. R. L. Davies - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):186-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#513,926)

6 months
15 (#221,138)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references