The Right to an Adequate Standard of Living: Justice, Autonomy, and the Basic Needs

Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (1):231 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights reads as follows: “Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services.” I shall refer to the right postulated here as “the right to an adequate standard of living” or “The Right.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
183 (#132,295)

6 months
25 (#126,508)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Copp
University of California, Davis

Citations of this work

Egalitarianism and equal availability of political influence.Harry Brighouse - 1996 - Journal of Political Philosophy 4 (2):118–141.
On future generations' future rights.Axel Gosseries - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (4):446-474.
Basic human needs: abstraction, indeterminacy and the political account of need.George Boss - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (7):1140-1162.
The moral foundation of employee rights.John R. Rowan - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 24 (4):355 - 361.
Political theory and the politics of need.George Boss - forthcoming - European Journal of Political Theory.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Kantian constructivism in moral theory.John Rawls - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (9):515-572.
What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare.Ronald Dworkin - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (3):185-246.
How to distinguish self-respect from self-esteem.David Sachs - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (4):346-360.

View all 9 references / Add more references