Visible and invisible in physical theory

Foundations of Physics 13 (2):247-251 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The following question is considered: How is it that physicists can invent equations, so rich in structure, so detailed in consequences, and so closely in agreement with experience?

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf01889483

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Relativity Visualized.Lewis C. Epstein - 1985 - Insight Press.
Objectivity versus Nonobjectivity in Quantum Mechanics.Claudio Garola - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (9):1539-1565.
Doing Physics: How Physicists Take Hold of the World.Martin H. Krieger - 1992 - Indiana University Press.
Interpreting theories without a spacetime.Sebastian De Haro & Henk W. de Regt - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (3):631-670.
Determinism, Physical Possibility, and Laws of Nature.Balázs Gyenis - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (6):568-581.
Interpreting theories without a spacetime.Henk Regt & Sebastian Haro - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (3):631-670.
What Do Symmetries Tell Us About Structure?Thomas William Barrett - 2017 - Philosophy of Science (4):617-639.
Structure and Equivalence.Neil Dewar - 2022 - Cambridge University Press.
Invariance, Symmetry and Meaning.Patrick Suppes - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (10):1569-1585.
Projective spacetime.B. E. Eichinger - 1977 - Foundations of Physics 7 (9-10):673-703.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
18 (#1,116,505)

6 months
8 (#594,873)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references