Interruptibility as a constraint on hybrid systems

Minds and Machines 3 (1):73-96 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely mooted that a plausible computational cognitive model should involve both symbolic and connectionist components. However, sound principles for combining these components within a hybrid system are currently lacking; the design of such systems is oftenad hoc. In an attempt to ameliorate this we provide a framework of types of hybrid systems and constraints therein, within which to explore the issues. In particular, we suggest the use of system independent constraints, whose source lies in general considerations about cognitive systems, rather than in particular technological or task-based considerations. We illustrate this through a detailed examination of an interruptibility constraint: handling interruptions is a fundamental facet of cognition in a dynamic world. Aspects of interruptions are delineated, as are their precise expression in symbolic and connectionist systems. We illustrate the interaction of the various constraints from interruptibility in the different types of hybrid systems. The picture that emerges of the relationship between the connectionist and the symbolic within a hybrid system provides for sufficient flexibility and complexity to suggest interesting general implications for cognition, thus vindicating the utility of the framework.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hybrid artificial intelligence system in constraint based scheduling of integrated manufacturing ERP systems.Izabela Rojek & Mieczysław Jagodziński - 2012 - In Emilio Corchado, Vaclav Snasel, Ajith Abraham, Michał Woźniak, Manuel Grana & Sung-Bae Cho (eds.), Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems. Springer. pp. 229--240.
Putting together connectionism – again.Paul Smolensky - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (1):59-74.
The Newell test for a theory of cognition.John R. Anderson & Christian Lebiere - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):587-601.
Weighted o-minimal hybrid systems.Patricia Bouyer, Thomas Brihaye & Fabrice Chevalier - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (3):268-288.
Transparency in AI.Tolgahan Toy - 2024 - AI and Society 39 (6):2841-2851.
A proof–theoretic study of the correspondence of hybrid logic and classical logic.H. Kushida & M. Okada - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (1):35-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
56 (#383,923)

6 months
6 (#856,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
Unified theories of cognition.Allen Newell - 1990 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
On the proper treatment of connectionism.Paul Smolensky - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (1):1-23.
Situations and Attitudes.Jon Barwise - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (11):668.

View all 11 references / Add more references