Abstract

Resumen: Se analiza la �tica del discurso de Habermas para considerar dentro de la reflexi�n �tica el cambio que la ciencia y la tecnolog�a generan en la sociedad. La Diskursethik no considera la historicidad del ser humano y mantiene la posici�n kantiana que separa lo racional de lo fenom�nico. Ante la negaci�n para conceder un valor a la ciencia que no sea su sometimiento a los dictados de la raz�n te�rica, se presentan los rasgos fundamentales de una �tica din�mica que contemple el futuro de la humanidad y la naturaleza como su terreno propio.: The Diskursethik of J�rgen Habermas is analysed in order to consider, in the field of Ethical reflection, the change that Science and Technology drive into Society. It is pointed out that Diskursethik does not take into account the historicity of human being and suscribes a kantian position that separate rationality from phenomenology. Facing Habermas"�s denial to recognize a value to science different from its submission to dictum of theoretical reason, this paper offers the main features of a dynamical ethics which sees the future of humanity and nature as its own object