Aristotelian Formal and Material Logic

Lanham, MD, USA: Upa (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Based on Aristotle's analysis of the form and matter found in human thought, this book examines the three steps the mind takes in arriving at the truth: defining, judging, and reasoning. The author further analyzes the type of material demanded for scientific or demonstrative knowledge: universal, necessary, and proper propositions and applies this examination to modern science

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

9780819199058   0819199060   0819199052

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review. [REVIEW]Mark Johnson - 1998 - The Thomist 62:490-493.
Logic: An Aristotelian Approach.Mary Michael Spangler - 1993 - Lanham, MD, USA: Upa.
Aristotle's Logic and Theory of Science.Wolfgang Detel - 2018 - In Sean D. Kirkland & Eric Sanday (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. pp. 245–269.
Aristotle’s Syllogistic, Modern Deductive Logic, and Scientific Demonstration.Edward M. Engelmann - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (4):535-552.
Aristotle's Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. [REVIEW]J. C. J. - 1957 - Review of Metaphysics 11 (2):349-349.
Causation and intensionality in Aristotelian Logic.Srećko Kovač - 2013 - Studia Philosophiae Christianae 49 (2):117-136.
Is an Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind Still Credible?M. F. Burnyeat - 1992 - In Martha C. Nussbaum & Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (eds.), Essays on Aristotle's de Anima. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Exclusive Premises.Charlene Elsby - 2018-05-09 - In Robert Arp, Steven Barbone & Michael Bruce (eds.), Bad Arguments. Wiley. pp. 49–54.
Logic and/in psychology: The paradoxes of material implication and psychologism in the cognitive science of human reasoning.Walter Schroyens - 2010 - In Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater (eds.), Cognition and Conditionals: Probability and Logic in Human Thought. Oxford University Press.
What is “Formal Logic”?Jean-Yves Béziau - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 13:9-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-20

Downloads
15 (#1,240,446)

6 months
3 (#1,480,774)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Language, concepts, and the nature of inference.Matías Osta-Vélez - 2024 - In Carlos Enrique Caorsi & Ricardo J. Navia (eds.), Philosophy of language in Uruguay: language, meaning, and philosophy. Lanham: Lexington Books. pp. 181-196.
Inference and the structure of concepts.Matías Osta Vélez - 2020 - Dissertation, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references