Aristotle and Galen on sex difference and reproduction: a new approach to an ancient rivalry

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (3):405-427 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In contrast to Aristotle's male oriented explanation of procreation the Galenic was 'feminist' inasmuch as both sexes were presented as contributing equally in conception and accordingly both had to experience pleasure... Anatomically, the two sexes were presented in Galenic accounts as complementary, the difference being that the man's genitalia were on the outside and the woman's on the inside. The clitoris was likened to the penis and the ovaries considered 'testicles' or 'stones' that produced seed. The male seed was, it is true, depicted by Galenists as superior in having 'spiritual' qualities lacking in the female, but Galen's reproductive schema was far more egalitarian than Aristotle's.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
135 (#162,740)

6 months
15 (#194,860)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sophia Connell
Birkbeck, University of London

References found in this work

Aristotle and woman.Mary Anne Cline Horowitz - 1976 - Journal of the History of Biology 9 (2):183-213.
Galen's criticism of Aristotle's conception theory.Anthony Preus - 1977 - Journal of the History of Biology 10 (1):65-85.
Aristotle and Woman.Maryanne Cline Horowitz - 1976 - Journal of the History of Biology 9 (2):183 - 213.

View all 11 references / Add more references