Reinventing the Philosophy of Nature

Review of Metaphysics 33 (1):3 - 28 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

PHILOSOPHY of nature is not currently considered standard fare in philosophy. Rather than the title of an area of inquiry, it has become the name of an isolated historical phenomenon—the Naturphilosophie of Schelling, Goethe, and Hegel, or a label for some school doctrine—the continuing tradition built upon the first books of Aristotle’s Physics or the newer one rooted in Whitehead’s Process and Reality. Philosophers do not typically see these systems of thought in terms of a common problematic, certainly not one which is presently viable or important.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

F. W. J. Schelling.Thomas Franklin O'Meara - 1977 - Review of Metaphysics 31 (2):283 - 309.
Physics, Book VIII. [REVIEW]Leo J. Elders - 2000 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (1):130-130.
On Aristotle’s Physics 5. [REVIEW]Leo J. Elders - 1997 - Review of Metaphysics 51 (2):444-445.
Whitehead’s Philosophy, Selected Essays, 1935-1970. [REVIEW]M. C. - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 27 (2):389-389.
The Systems of Whitehead’s Metaphysics. [REVIEW]Jude P. Dougherty - 2016 - Review of Metaphysics 70 (1):136-138.
The Philosophy of Nature in Hegel's System.Errol E. Harris - 1949 - Review of Metaphysics 3 (2):213 - 228.
Whitehead's Philosophy of Science and Metaphysics. [REVIEW]W. S. D. - 1982 - Review of Metaphysics 35 (4):886-887.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
69 (#305,058)

6 months
4 (#1,247,585)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John J. Compton
PhD: Yale University; Last affiliation: Vanderbilt University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references