Pernicious logical metaphors

Logique Et Analyse 53 (210):185 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My real position is that logic is a mere sub-branch of rhetoric, but in this paper I only try to show an area of overlap. Certain usages in logical work are metaphorical, and I argue that this has pernicious effects in a discipline assumed strictly literal. Among these pernicious effects are the bizarre and fruitless focus of philosophy of mathematics on the pseudo-problems of foundations and objects. I mostly examine the locution 'logical construction' and a range of associated metaphors. Some sketchy remarks on the history of rhetoric are offered in explanation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The normative problem for logical pluralism.Nathan Kellen - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (3-4):258-281.
What Logical Evidence Could not be.Matteo Baggio - 2023 - Philosophia 51 (5):2559–2587.
The Reason of Rhetoric.Emmanuelle Danblon - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):493-507.
A Defense of Davidson's Theory of Metaphor.Robert Bower Horner - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Miami
Metaphor, Cognitivity, and Meaning-Holism.Michael Hymers - 1998 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 31 (4):266 - 282.
Anomalous monism in carnap's.Mehdi Nasrin - 2004 - Erkenntnis:283-293.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-19

Downloads
449 (#64,067)

6 months
91 (#68,485)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Edwin Coleman
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
Languages of Art.Nelson Goodman - 1970 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (1):62-63.
The Philosophical Imaginary.Michele Le Doeuff - 1989 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

View all 10 references / Add more references