Collective Responsibility Gaps

Journal of Business Ethics 154 (4):943-954 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Which kinds of responsibility can we attribute to which kinds of collective, and why? In contrast, which kinds of collective responsibility can we not attribute—which kinds are ‘gappy’? This study provides a framework for answering these questions. It begins by distinguishing between three kinds of collective and three kinds of responsibility. It then explains how gaps—i.e. cases where we cannot attribute the responsibility we might want to—appear to arise within each type of collective responsibility. It argues some of these gaps do not exist on closer inspection, at least for some collectives and some of the time.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-05

Downloads
250 (#110,715)

6 months
131 (#43,258)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephanie Collins
Monash University

Citations of this work

Group Agency and Artificial Intelligence.Christian List - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology (4):1-30.
Artificial agents: responsibility & control gaps.Herman Veluwenkamp & Frank Hindriks - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Collective moral agency and self-induced moral incapacity.Niels de Haan - 2023 - Philosophical Explorations 26 (1):1-22.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Group agency: the possibility, design, and status of corporate agents.Christian List & Philip Pettit - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Philip Pettit.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
Responsibility for Justice.Iris Marion Young - 2011 - , US: Oxford University Press USA.

View all 48 references / Add more references