Normative Skepticism about Attributive Human Goodness

Australasian Philosophical Review 7 (2):155-163 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some philosophers hope to answer normative moral skepticism by appeal to a moralized account of attributive human goodness. They give accounts of good and bad human beings, maintain that to be a good human being one must be moral, and then argue that human beings should be moral because otherwise they will be defective or less than ideal members of their kind. This article focuses on Yong Huang's Confucian, Zhu Xi inspired, version of this argument. I develop Daoist inspired skeptical arguments which challenge his claims that to be a good human being one must be moral and that human beings should aim to be good members of their kind.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,583

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bradford Cokelet
University of Kansas

Citations of this work

Agent-focused Moral Realism Defended: Responses to my Critics.Yong Huang - 2023 - Australasian Philosophical Review 7 (2):195-210.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - In Mary J. Gregor, Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 37-108.

Add more references