Can the logic of indirect discourse be formalised?

Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (3):225-232 (1957)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

edition Cohen, L. Jonathan; Prior, A. N.; Goodstein, R. L. (1967) "Can the Logic of Indirect Discourse be Formalised?". Journal of Symbolic Logic 32(4):549-550

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
69 (#308,916)

6 months
17 (#183,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Classical intensional logics.M. J. Cresswell - 1970 - Theoria 36 (3):347-372.
Why do cretans have to say so much?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1961 - Philosophical Studies 12 (5):72 - 78.
Gaps, Gluts, and Paradox.A. D. Irvine - 1992 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 18 (sup1):273-299.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays.Frank Plumpton Ramsey - 1925 - London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Edited by R. B. Braithwaite.
Time and Modality.A. N. PRIOR - 1957 - Philosophy 34 (128):56-59.
Intensional isomorphism and identity of belief.Alonzo Church - 1954 - Philosophical Studies 5 (5):65 - 73.
The inconsistency or redundancy of principia mathematica.Irving M. Copi - 1950 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 11 (2):190-199.

View all 7 references / Add more references