A formalisation of referentially opaque contexts

Journal of Symbolic Logic 25 (3):193-202 (1960)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2964674

Other Versions

reprint Cohen, L. Jonathan (1967) "A Formalisation of Referentially Opaque Contexts". Journal of Symbolic Logic 32(4):550-550

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

L. Jonathan Cohen. Can the logic of indirect discourse be formalised?The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 22 , pp. 225–232. - A. N. Prior. Epimenides the Cretan. The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 23 no. 3 , pp. 261–266. - R. L. Goodstein. On the formalisation of indirect discourse. The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 23 no. 4 , pp. 417–419. - L. Jonathan Cohen. Professor Goodstein's formalisation of the policeman. The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 23 no. 4 , p. 420. [REVIEW]S. Kanger - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (4):549-550.
Are modal contexts referentially opaque?J. M. Orenduff - 1977 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 18 (1):128-132.
Review: L. Jonathan Cohen, Tense Usage and Propositions. [REVIEW]Alice Ambrose - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):297-298.
Cohen L. Jonathan. Are philosophical theses relative to language? Analysis , vol. 9 no. 5 , pp. 72–77.Alonzo Church - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (1):63-63.
A. N. Prior. Thank goodness that's over. Philosophy, vol. 34 , pp. 12–17. - L. Jonathan Cohen. Professor Prior on thanking goodness that's over. Philosophy, vol. 34 , pp. 360–362. - A. N. Prior. Mr. Cohen on thanking goodness that p and q. Philosophy, vol. 34 , pp. 362–363. - L. Jonathan Cohen. A brief rejoinder to Professor Prior. Philosophy, vol. 34 , pp. 363–364. [REVIEW]S. Kanger - 1960 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 25 (4):343-343.
L. Jonathan Cohen. Why do Cretans have to say so much?Philosophical studies , vol. 12 , pp. 72–78. - A. N. Prior. Indirect speech again. Philosophical studies , vol. 14 , pp. 12–15. - L. Jonathan Cohen. Indirect speech: A rejoinder to Prof. A. N. Prior. Philosophical studies , vol. 14 , pp. 15–18. - A. N. Prior. Indirect speech and extensionality. Philosophical studies , vol. 15 , pp. 35–38. - L. Jonathan Cohen. Indirect speech: A further rejoinder to Professor Prior. Philosophical studies , vol. 15 , pp. 38–40. [REVIEW]S. Kanger - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (4):550-550.
Book Review:Applications of Inductive Logic L. Jonathan Cohen, Mary Hesse. [REVIEW]Paul Horwich - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (1):167-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
57 (#378,556)

6 months
25 (#127,011)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

From a Logical Point of View.Richard M. Martin - 1955 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (4):574-575.
Symbolic Logic.C. I. Lewis & C. H. Langford - 1932 - Erkenntnis 4 (1):65-66.
Is There Only One Correct System of Modal Logic?E. J. Lemmon & G. P. Henderson - 1959 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 33 (1):23-56.

Add more references