Oakeshott, Strauss and the Romans

In Eric S. Kos (ed.), Oakeshott’s Skepticism, Politics, and Aesthetics. Springer Verlag. pp. 111-125 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the differences between Oakeshott and Leo Strauss over the place of the ancient Romans in Western thought, by addressing the puzzling silence of Strauss and on the place of Roman thought in this history. It suggests the Straussian narrative that early modern thinkers “dethroned” the contemplative life and elevated the importance of practical concerns, are part of a strategy to fill the vacuum and counter the baleful effects left by centuries of otherworldly, perfectionist Christian ethics. It raises the question whether this is a rhetorical strategy to avoid lessening the force of Strauss’s particular critique of modernity as something new, as opposed to Oakeshott’s account of greater continuity in political thought and practice.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,190

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-10

Downloads
4 (#1,811,928)

6 months
2 (#1,677,727)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references