The humanness of artificial non-normative personalities

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40:e259 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Technoscientific ambitions for perfecting human-like machines, by advancing state-of-the-art neuromorphic architectures and cognitive computing, may end in ironic regret without pondering the humanness of fallible artificial non-normative personalities. Self-organizing artificial personalities individualize machine performance and identity through fuzzy conscientiousness, emotionality, extraversion/introversion, and other traits, rendering insights into technology-assisted human evolution, robot ethology/pedagogy, and best practices against unwanted autonomous machine behavior.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Performance vs. competence in human–machine comparisons.Chaz Firestone - 2020 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 41.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-18

Downloads
16 (#1,221,991)

6 months
4 (#1,064,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A New Kind of Science.Stephen Wolfram - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (1):112-114.
Machine wanting.Daniel W. McShea - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4b):679-687.

View all 6 references / Add more references