'Obviously propositions are nothing': Russell and the logical form of belief reports

In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 409--420 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Varieties of Logical Form.Mark Sainsbury - 2020 - Disputatio 12 (58):223-250.
Logical form and the relational conception of belief.Robert J. Matthews - 2002 - In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 421--43.
What is Logical Form?Ernest Lepore & Kirk Ludwig - 2002 - In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 54-90.
Belief and Logical Form.James Higginbotham - 1991 - Mind and Language 6 (4):344-369.
Russell's Theory of Definite Descriptions as a Paradigm for Philosophy.Gregory Landini - 2002 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), A Companion to Philosophical Logic. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 194–223.
Propositions and logical form.Andrea Iacona - 2020 - Rivista di Filosofia 111:33-53.
The Face-Value Theory.Stephen Schiffer - 2003 - In The things we mean. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-06

Downloads
94 (#223,882)

6 months
8 (#583,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Lenny Clapp
Northern Illinois University
Robert Stainton
Western University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references