White Morton G.. A note on the “paradox of analysis.” Mind, n.s. vol. 54 , pp. 71–72.Black Max. The “paradox of analysis” again: a reply. Mind, n.s. vol. 54 , pp. 272–273.White Morton G.. Analysis and identity: a rejoinder. Mind, n.s. vol. 54 , pp. 357–361.Black Max. How can analysis be informative? Philosophy and phenomenological research, vol. 6 no. 4 , pp. 628–631 [Book Review]

Journal of Symbolic Logic 11 (4):132-133 (1946)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2268327

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,824

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Black Max. The “paradox of analysis.” Mind, n.s. vol. 53 , pp. 263–267.C. H. Langford - 1944 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 9 (4):104-105.
Jose EncarnacionJr., On Ushenko's version of the liar-paradox. Mind, n.s. vol. 64 , pp. 99–100. - A. P. Ushenko. A note on the liar-paradox. Mind, n.s. vol. 64 , p. 543. - Eric Toms. The Liar Paradox. The philosophical review, vol. 65 , pp. 542–547. - Keith S. Donnellan. A note on the liar paradox. The philosophical review, vol. 66 , pp. 394–397. - A. P. Ushenko. An addendum to the note on the liar-paradox. Mind, n.s. vol. 66 , p. 98. - Eric Toms. Reply to a note on the liar paradox. The philosophical review, vol. 67 , pp. 101–105. - William W. Rozeboom. Is Epimenides still lying?Analysis , vol. 18 no. 5 , pp. 105–113. - W. J. Huggett. Paradox lost. Analysis , vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 21–23. - C. H. Whiteley. Let Epimenides lie! Analysis , vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 23–24. - Sibanban. Mr. Eric Toms on the liar paradox. Mind, n.s. vol. 74 , pp. 421–423. [REVIEW]Jonathan Bennett - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (1):108-112.
Reviews - Fred Sommers. The ordinary language tree. Mind, n.s. vol. 68 , pp. 160–185. - Fred Sommers. Predicability. Philosophy in America, edited by Max Black, Cornell University Press, Ithaca1965, pp. 262–281. - L. R. Reinhardt. Dualism and categories. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, n.s. vol. 66 , pp. 71–92. - David Massie. Sommers' tree theory, a reply to de Sousa. The Journal of philosophy, vol. 64 , pp. 185–193. - Susan Haack. Equivocality, a discussion of Sommers' views. Analysis , vol. 28 no. 5 , pp. 159–165. - R. van Straaten. Sommers' rule and equivocality. Analysis , vol. 29 no. 2 , pp. 58–61. - Dan Passell. On Sommers' logic of sense and nonsense. Mind, n.s. vol. 78 , pp. 132–133. - A. G. Elgood. Sommers' rules of sense. The philosophical quarterly, vol. 20 , pp. 166–169. [REVIEW]Jonathan Bennett - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (4):666-670.
Max Black. The identity of indiscernibles. Mind, n.s. vol. 61 , pp. 153–164. Reprinted with minor changes in: Problems of analysis, Philosophical essays, by Max Black, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1954, pp. 80–92, 292–293. - Gustav Bergmann. The identity of indiscernibles and the formalist definition of “identity.”Mind, n.s. vol. 62 , pp. 75–79. - N. L. Wilson. The identity of indiscernibles and the symmetrical universe. Mind, n.s. vol. 62 , pp. 506–511. - A. J. Ayer. The identity of indiscernibles. Actes du XIème Congrès International de Philosophie, Volume III, Métaphysique et ontologie, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam1953, and Éditions E. Nauwelaerts, Louvain 1953, pp. 124–129. Reprinted in Philosophical essays by A. J. Ayer, St. Martin's Press, New York 1954, and Macmillan & Co., London 1954, pp. 26–35. - D. J. O'Connor. The identity of indiscernibles. Analysis , vol. 14 no. 5 , pp. 103–110. - Nicholas Rescher. The identity of indiscernibles: A reinterpretation. The. [REVIEW]Charles A. Baylis - 1956 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (1):85-86.
Shaw R.. The paradox of the unexpected examination. Mind, n.s. vol. 67 , pp. 382–384.Lyon Ardon. The prediction paradox. Mind, n.s. vol. 68 , pp. 510–517.Nerlich G. C.. Unexpected examinations and unprovable statements. Mind, n.s. vol. 70 , pp. 503–513.Medlin Brian. The unexpected examination. American philosophical quarterly , vol. 1 no. 1 , pp. 66–72. See Corrigenda, Brian Medlin. The unexpected examination. American philosophical quarterly , vol. 1 no. 1 , p. 333.)Fitch Frederic B.. A Goedelized formulation of the prediction paradox. American philosophical quarterly , vol. 1 no. 1 , pp. 161–164. [REVIEW]Jonathan Bennett - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):101-102.
Wisdom J. O.. Positivism. Mind, n.s. vol. 54 , pp. 65–70.Ernest Nagel - 1945 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 10 (1):21-22.
Keene G. B.. Note on the identity of indiscernibles. Mind, n.s. vol. 65 , pp. 252–254.Charles A. Baylis - 1957 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (3):311-311.
Sellars Wilfrid. Presupposing. The philosophical review, vol. 63 , pp. 197–215.Strawson P. F.. A reply to Mr. Sellars. The philosophical review, vol. 63 , pp. 216–231.Black Max. Presupposition and implication. Kagaku tetsugaku eno michi , Essays in the philosophical analysis IV, edited by Uyeda Seizi, Waseda University Press, Tokyo 1958, pp. 433–448.Dykstra Vergil H.. Philosophers and presuppositions. Mind, n.s. vol. 69 , pp. 63–68. [REVIEW]Michael Dummett - 1960 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 25 (4):336-339.
B. Meltzer. The third possibility. Mind, n.s. vol. 73 , pp. 430–433. - B. Meltzer and I. J. Good. Two forms of the prediction paradox. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 16 no. 61 , pp. 50–51. - William H. Halberstadt. In defence of Euclid: A reply to B. Meltzer. Mind, n.s. vol. 76 , p. 282. [REVIEW]Alan Ross Anderson - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (3):458-459.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
96 (#235,963)

6 months
17 (#185,298)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Sensational sentences switched.Georges Rey - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 68 (3):289 - 319.
Mates and the hierarchy.Marion Durand & Gurpreet Rattan - 2022 - Synthese 200 (6):1-24.
Frege, Perry, and Demonstratives.Palle Yourgrau - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (4):725 - 752.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references