Is neuroscience relevant to philosophy?

Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 16:323-341 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many questions concerning the nature of the mind have remained intractable since their first systematic discussion by the ancient Greeks. What is the nature of knowledge, and how is it possible to represent the world? What are consciousness and free will? What is the self and how is it that some organisms are more intelligent than others? Since it is now overwhelmingly evident that these are phenomena of the physical brain, it is not surprising that an established empirical and theoretical foundation in this domain has eluded us for so long. For in order to understand what we are and how we work, we must understand the brain and how it works. Yet the brain is exceedingly difficult to study, and research on any significant scale is critically dependent on advanced technology.

Other Versions

reprint Churchland, Patricia Smith (1990) "Is Neuroscience Relevant to Philosophy?". Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20(sup1):323-341

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
59 (#361,724)

6 months
10 (#402,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patricia Churchland
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references