Parecidos de familia. Michael P. Hodges y John Lachs, Thinking in the Ruins. Wittgenstein and Santayana on Contingency [Book Review]

Laguna 7 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,885

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thinking in the Ruins: Wittgenstein and Santayana on Contingency.Michael Hodges & John Lachs - 2001 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 37 (1):137-142.
Thinking in the ruins: Wittgenstein and Santayana on contingency.Michael P. Hodges - 2000 - Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press. Edited by John Lachs.
Introduction: John Lachs's Philosophical Pluralism.Eric Ritter - 2024 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 59 (3):293-296.
John Lachs, "George Santayana". [REVIEW]T. L. S. Sprigge - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40 (58):119.
John Lachs, "George Santayana". [REVIEW]James E. Abbott - 1989 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 25 (3):355.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Pérez Chico
Universidad de Zaragoza (Spain)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references