Why Not a Sound Postulate?

Foundations of Physics 51 (3):1-20 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What, if anything, would be wrong with replacing the light postulate in Einstein’s 1905 formulation of special relativity with a ‘sound postulate’, stating that the speed of sound is independent of the speed of the source? After reviewing the historical reasons underlying the particular focus on light in the special theory, we consider the circumstances under which such a theory of ‘sonic relativity’ would be justified on empirical grounds. We then consider the philosophical upshots of ‘sonic relativity’ for four contemporary areas of investigation in the philosophy of spacetime: global versus subsystem symmetries, dynamical versus geometrical approaches to spacetime, the possibility of a preferred frame in theories of quantum gravity, and spacetime functionalism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tolerance for spacetime singularities.John Earman - 1996 - Foundations of Physics 26 (5):623-640.
Gauge Theory Gravity with Geometric Calculus.David Hestenes - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (6):903-970.
Announcement.[author unknown] - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (1):177-178.
Erratum.[author unknown] - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (6):1023-1025.
Preface.[author unknown] - 2001 - Foundations of Physics 31 (6):873-874.
Announcement.[author unknown] - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (2):345-346.
Erratum.[author unknown] - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (6):1027-1027.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-21

Downloads
45 (#485,968)

6 months
11 (#322,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Bryan Cheng
University of Oxford
James Read
Oxford University

References found in this work

The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science.Nancy Cartwright - 1999 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
What is structural realism?James Ladyman - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (3):409-424.

View all 42 references / Add more references