Abstract

Tang Jun-yi of human life is divided into natural, three levels of morality and religion. He described his people's natural desire to go beyond the self that exists between the two conflicts, and to whether certain self-consciousness as a unified moral consciousness and religious consciousness to distinguish the difference between the basis. Moral self-consciousness is certainly a unified; religious self-consciousness is the loss of a unified self-conscious, and showed a mythical confrontation duality. Through the author's subjectivity and moral consciousness as a contrast, from the following six areas of discussion over the subject of religious consciousness: A theory of Tang Junyi's "super-objective and subjective realm." Second, Martin Buber's theory • "I am the pure and eternal full filling your relationship." Third, Paul Tillich's theory • "Beyond the moral conscience." Fourth, the "self-discipline" and "heteronomy" inappropriate comparison. Fifth, the subject is beyond the awareness within and beyond the consciousness of the subject beyond comparison. Six, self-awareness and enlightenment of the contrast. Dr.Tang Chun Yi defines three levels of life for human beings: physical, moral, and religious. He analyzes human self-consciousness and points out the conflict between desire and transcending desire. The awareness of an unitary self is considered a criterion in distinguishing moral and religious consciousness. A moral consciousness affirms an unitary self, while the religious consciousness loses it. This loss creates the duality of the divine and the demonic. I would like to contrast the suprasubjective religious consciousness with the subjective moral consciousness from six aspects: a) Dr.Tang 's concept of "the state of transcending the subject and the object", b) Martin Bubber's concept of "the complete relation between the I and the eternal Thou". c) Paul Tillich's concept of "transmoral consciousness". d ) The inappropriate contrast between "autonomy" and "heteronomy". e) The contrast between the transcendent consciousness in the subject and the transcendent consciousness of transcending the subject. f) The contrast between self-awareness and revelativity.