- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: The case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks
Artificial Intelligence 269 (C):27-48 (2019)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Audiences in argumentation frameworks.Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Sylvie Doutre & Paul E. Dunne - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (1):42-71.
Abstract argumentation frameworks with strong and weak constraints.Gianvincenzo Alfano, Sergio Greco, Domenico Mandaglio, Francesco Parisi & Irina Trubitsyna - 2024 - Artificial Intelligence 336 (C):104205.
Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks.Dorothea Baumeister, Daniel Neugebauer, Jörg Rothe & Hilmar Schadrack - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence 264 (C):1-26.
Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks.Dorothea Baumeister, Matti Järvisalo, Daniel Neugebauer, Andreas Niskanen & Jörg Rothe - 2021 - Artificial Intelligence 295 (C):103470.
Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks.Gianvincenzo Alfano, Marco Calautti, Sergio Greco, Francesco Parisi & Irina Trubitsyna - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence 323 (C):103967.
On the Input/Output behavior of argumentation frameworks.Pietro Baroni, Guido Boella, Federico Cerutti, Massimiliano Giacomin, Leendert van der Torre & Serena Villata - 2014 - Artificial Intelligence 217 (C):144-197.
Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks.Emilia Oikarinen & Stefan Woltran - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (14-15):1985-2009.
Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks.Sanjay Modgil - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence 173 (9-10):901-934.
The complexity landscape of claim-augmented argumentation frameworks.Wolfgang Dvořák, Alexander Greßler, Anna Rapberger & Stefan Woltran - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence 317 (C):103873.
Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks.Ringo Baumann - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence 193 (C):18-44.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
17 (#1,150,890)
6 months
3 (#1,470,638)
2020-12-22
Downloads
17 (#1,150,890)
6 months
3 (#1,470,638)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A tool for merging extensions of abstract argumentation frameworks.Jérôme Delobelle & Jean-Guy Mailly - 2022 - Argument and Computation 13 (3):361-368.
References found in this work
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.Phan Minh Dung - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 77 (2):321-357.
Aggregating sets of judgments: An impossibility result.Christian List & Philip Pettit - 2002 - Economics and Philosophy 18 (1):89-110.
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments.Henry Prakken - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (2):93-124.
On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms.Martin Caminada & Leila Amgoud - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (5-6):286-310.
Computing ideal sceptical argumentation.P. M. Dung, P. Mancarella & F. Toni - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (10-15):642-674.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-vpvvv uwo