Is courtroom discourse an ‘oral’ or ‘literate’ register? The importance of sub-register

Discourse Studies 23 (3):249-273 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By applying Multi-Dimensional Analysis, this study has provided a thorough description of the lexico-grammatical characteristics of courtroom discourse to see to what extent it employs both linguistic features of oral registers and literate registers. In particular, this study focuses on language used in the four public sub-registers of courtroom discourse and analyzes how oral/literate each sub-register is, instead of characterizing courtroom discourse as oral/literate overall. Detailed interpretation of results focuses on Dimension 1 and 2 as these two dimensions are identified as universal parameters of register variation. A corpus of high-profile courtroom trials was compiled for this study that includes the O. J. Simpson criminal trial, the Boston Marathon bombing trial, and the Oklahoma bombing trial.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Register System and General Principles of Register Interoperability.Andrejus Novikovas - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 122 (4):357-371.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-26

Downloads
14 (#1,279,562)

6 months
5 (#1,047,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references