- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Black Swans of CRISPR: Stochasticity and Complexity of Genetic Regulation
Bioessays 41 (7):1900032 (2019)
Abstract
Graphical AbstractRecent waves of controversies surrounding genetic engineering have spilled into popular science in Twitter battles between reputable scientists and their followers. Here, a cautionary perspective on the possible blind spots and risks of CRISPR and related biotechnologies is presented, focusing in particular on the stochastic nature of cellular control processes.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
CRISPR Cautions: Biosecurity Implications of Gene Editing.Rachel M. West & Gigi Kwik Gronvall - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (1):73-92.
Altered Inheritance: Crispr and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.Françoise Baylis - 2019 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
“Editing”: A Productive Metaphor for Regulating CRISPR.Ben Merriman - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):62-64.
He Jiankui´s gene‐editing experiment and the non‐identity problem.Marcos Alonso & Julian Savulescu - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (6):563-573.
CRISPR as a Driving Force: The Model T of Biotechnology.Carlos Mariscal & Angel Petropanagos - 2016 - Monash Bioethics Review 34 (2):1-16.
The promise and peril of CRISPR gene drives.Gabriel E. Zentner & Michael J. Wade - 2017 - Bioessays 39 (10):1700109.
Can the Use of CRISPR in Humans Result in Decreased Social Justice for Future Stakeholders?Michael W. Nestor & Richard L. Wilson - 2018 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 9 (1):5-16.
Managing New Technology When Effective Control is Lost: Facing Hard Choices With CRISPR.Joel Andrew Zimbelman - 2022 - Journal of Religious Ethics 50 (3):433-460.
A critical review of the ethical and legal issues in human germline gene editing: Considering human rights and a call for an African perspective.B. Shozi - 2020 - South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 13 (1):62.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-05-16
Downloads
36 (#626,850)
6 months
7 (#704,497)
2019-05-16
Downloads
36 (#626,850)
6 months
7 (#704,497)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Introducing the 21st Century's New Four Horsemen of the Coronapocalypse.Kang Hao Cheong & Michael C. Jones - 2020 - Bioessays 42 (7):2000063.
Repurposing Vaccines in the Fight against COVID‐19.Kang Hao Cheong - 2020 - Bioessays 42 (11):2000234.
Synaptic Pruning in Schizophrenia: Does Minocycline Modulate Psychosocial Brain Development?Michael C. Jones, Jin Ming Koh & Kang Hao Cheong - 2020 - Bioessays 42 (9):2000046.
References found in this work
“Memetic Engineering”, Please! Thought, Values and Behaviour Are as Important as Technology!Andrew Moore - 2019 - Bioessays 41 (1):1800242.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-zvk2b uwo