Aristotle and the pain of animals: Nicomachean Ethics 1154b7–9

Classical Quarterly (1):1-8 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explains the motivation behind Aristotle’s appeal in Nicomachean Ethics 1154b7–9 to the physiologoi, who notoriously declare that animals are constantly in pain. It argues that the physiologoi are neither the critical target of this chapter nor invoked to verify Aristotle’s commitment to the imperfection of the human condition. Rather, despite doctrinal disagreement, they help Aristotle develop a naturalistic story about how ordinary people easily indulge in sensory pleasures.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-02

Downloads
65 (#327,402)

6 months
19 (#155,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wei Cheng
Peking University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inconsistency and Ambiguity in Republic IX.Mehmet M. Erginel - 2011 - Classical Quarterly 61 (2):493-520.
Aristotle. The "Nicomachean Ethics". A Commentary.H. H. Joachim & D. B. Rees - 1952 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 57 (4):460-461.
Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics.H. Rackham - 1928 - Philosophical Review 37 (3):282-284.

View all 9 references / Add more references