The Compatibility of Individual and Common Good in Hobbes’s Philosophy

In Heikki Haara & Juhana Toivanen (eds.), Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Springer Verlag. pp. 219-236 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter considers the extent to which individual and common good are compatible within Thomas Hobbes’s philosophy. It explores Hobbes’s notion of “good”, and considers how he allows for the existence of “real” individual goods. Next, it examines Hobbes’s definition of common good as that which is “good for the commonwealth”. It is the sovereign who decides what is good for the commonwealth, but just as there are real individual goods, there are real common goods. Real goods for the commonwealth are those things that preserve its existence. It is argued that, in Hobbes’s theory, real individual goods are compatible with real common goods; moreover, it is this compatibility that ensures the stability and prosperity of the commonwealth. However, a condition in which all laws are directed to the real common good, and citizens see where their own real good lies, is an ideal, not a realistic political scenario for Hobbes. Real politics requires defusing potential conflict between individual goods and the common good in a different way: namely, by encouraging citizens to accept the sovereign’s judgement of what is “good”. Nevertheless, there are limits to what subjects will accept. Tracing the theoretical compatibility between real goods for individuals and for commonwealths in Hobbes’s thought shows how the preservation of a Hobbesian political community relies not only on citizens accepting the sovereign’s judgement, but also on the ability of sovereigns to see the real common good.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reason, Deliberation, and the Passions.Adrian Blau - 2013 - In Aloysius Martinich & Kinch Hoekstra (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Thomas Hobbes and the natural law.Kody W. Cooper - 2018 - Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.
Critical realism and common goods.Mark Hoipkemier - 2016 - Journal of Critical Realism 15 (1):53-71.
Global ethics and global common goods.Patrick Riordan - 2015 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
COVID and the Common Good.Greg Latemore - 2021 - Philosophy of Management 20 (3):257-269.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-04

Downloads
11 (#1,441,292)

6 months
3 (#1,391,129)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexandra Chadwick
University of Jyväskylä

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references