Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology

New York, NY: Oup Usa (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Though science and philosophy take different approaches to ontology, metaphysical inferences are relevant to interpreting scientific work, and empirical investigations are relevant to philosophy. This book argues that there is no uniquely rational way to determine which domains of ontology are appropriate for belief, making room for choice in a transformative account of scientific ontology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,836

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cautious realism and middle range ontology.P. D. Magnus - 2018 - Metascience 27 (3):365-370.
Reviews. [REVIEW]Ragnar van der Merwe & Carlos M. Roos - 2019 - Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 10 (1):109-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-18

Downloads
90 (#245,846)

6 months
14 (#217,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anjan Chakravartty
University of Miami

Citations of this work

Scientific Realism.Anjan Chakravartty - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Scientific Realism.Richard Boyd - 1984 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 21 (1&2):767-791.

View all 41 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references