- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Galileo's telescopic observations of Venus and Mars
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (2):175-184 (1985)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Alan Francis Chalmers: What is this thing called science?: An assessment of the nature and status of science and its methods. [REVIEW]Gunnar Andersson - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):389-392.
Replication or Monopoly? The Economies of Invention and Discovery in Galileo's Observations of 1610.Mario Biagioli - 2000 - Science in Context 13 (3-4):547-590.
Galileo on the Telescope and the Eye.Harold I. Brown - 1985 - Journal of the History of Ideas 46 (4):487-501.
Alan Chalmers, The Scientist's Atom and the Philosopher's Stone: How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms. Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer, 2009. Pp xii+287. ISBN 978-90-481-2361-2. £90.00. [REVIEW]Seth Suman - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Science 44 (3):463-465.
Science and Its Fabrication. By Alan Chalmers. [REVIEW]Robert C. Trundle - 1991 - Modern Schoolman 68 (4):331-333.
Alan Chalmers. Science and its Fabrication. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1990. Pp. xii + 142. ISBN 0-335-09318-3, £22.50 ; ISBN 0-335-09317-5, £6.99. [REVIEW]Stephen Sturdy - 1991 - British Journal for the History of Science 24 (1):128-128.
Alan F. Chalmers: The Scientist’s Atom and the Philosopher’s Stone: How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms.Michael R. Matthews - 2011 - Science & Education 20 (2):173-190.
The initial response to Galileo's lunar observations.Roger Ariew - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):571-581.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
162 (#144,028)
6 months
26 (#124,710)
2009-01-28
Downloads
162 (#144,028)
6 months
26 (#124,710)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The power of ARCHED hypotheses: Feyerabend's Galileo as a closet rationalist.Neil Thomason - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):255-264.
The Sociology Of Knowledge And The Epistemological Status Of Science.Alan Chalmers - 1988 - Thesis Eleven 21 (1):82-102.
La crítica de Paul Karl Feyerabend al modelo neo-positivista del significado.María Teresa Gargiulo de Vázquez - 2014 - Arbor 190 (769):a168.
Navegando em um oceano infinito: A física geométrica de Galileu e o problema do contínuo.Marcelo Moschetti - 2011 - Dissertation, University of Campinas, Brazil
References found in this work
The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1957 - Harvard University Press.
Objective Knowledge.K. R. Popper - 1972 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 4 (2):388-398.
Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1969 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69 (1):149 - 186.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-ls7fw uwo