Demonstration and Definition: Aristotle's Positive Views in Posterior Analytics Β.8–10 and Β.16–18

In Aristotle on meaning and essence. New York: Oxford University Press (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle seeks to resolve the problems raised in Posterior Analytics B.3–7 by arguing that our practices of definition and explanation are interdependent. It is not possible to define kinds without appeal to their causal structure, nor is it possible to single out the relevant causal structure without appeal to what is required for good definition. This is why Aristotle holds that the answer to the questions, ‘What is F?’ and ‘Why is F as it is?’ are the same. Neither definition nor explanation can be completed without assistance from the other.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explanation and Essence in Posterior Analytics II 16-17.Breno Andrade Zuppolini - 2018 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 24:229-264.
Definition in Aristotle.Gregory David Bayer - 1995 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Aristotle on Heuristic Inquiry and Demonstration of What it is.Kei Chiba - 2012 - In Christopher Shields (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. Oxford University Press USA.
Virtuous Circles.Aldo Antonelli - 2000 - In André Chapuis & Anil Gupta (eds.), Circularity, Definition and Truth. New Delhi: Sole distributor, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
5 (#1,749,582)

6 months
5 (#1,035,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references