Commitments, Reasons, and the Will

Oxford Studies in Metaethics 8 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter argues that there is a particular kind of ‘internal’ commitment typically made in the context of romantic love relationships that has striking meta-normative implications for how we understand the role of the will in practical normativity. Internal commitments cannot plausibly explain the reasons we have in committed relationships on the usual model—as triggering reasons that are already there, in the way that making a promise triggers a reason via a pre-existing norm of the form ‘If you make a promise to x, then you have a reason to x’. Instead, internal commitments are that in virtue of which one has the special reasons of committed relationships; they are the grounds of such reasons. In this way, the will is a source of practical normativity.

Other Versions

reprint Chang, Ruth (2013) "Commitment, Reasons, and the Will". In Shafer-Landau, Russ, Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 8, pp. 74-113: Oxford University Press (2013)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Normative Insignificance of the Will.Jason Kay - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-19.
The Normative Insignificance of the Will.Jason Kay - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies.
Grounding practical normativity: going hybrid.Ruth Chang - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (1):163-187.
Humean heroism: Value commitments and the source of normativity.Valerie Tiberius - 2000 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (4):426–446.
We Can Have Our Buck and Pass It, Too.Zöe Johnson King - 2019 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 14.
Voluntarist reasons and the sources of normativity.Ruth Chang - 2009 - In David Sobel & Steven Wall, Reasons for Action. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 243-71.
Normative Conflicts and the Structure of Normativity.Andrew Reisner - 2015 - In Iwao Hirose & Andrew Evan Reisner, Weighing and Reasoning: Themes From the Philosophy of John Broome. New York, NY: Oxford University Press UK.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-07

Downloads
751 (#36,100)

6 months
191 (#19,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ruth Chang
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

Grounding practical normativity: going hybrid.Ruth Chang - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (1):163-187.
Hard Choices.Ruth Chang - 2017 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (1):1-21.
Belief as Commitment to the Truth.Keshav Singh - forthcoming - In Eric Schwitzgebel & Jonathan Jong, The Nature of Belief. Oxford University Press.
Aesthetic Commitments and Aesthetic Obligations.Anthony Cross - 2022 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8 (38):402-422.
Do We Have Normative Powers?Ruth Chang - 2020 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 94 (1):275-300.

View all 45 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Intention, plans, and practical reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
On What Matters: Two-Volume Set.Derek Parfit - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:125-126.

View all 28 references / Add more references