Experience and a priori justification [Book Review]

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):665–671 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Laurence BonJour’s In Defense of Pure Reason is rich and challenging. It offers a tightly integrated attack on empiricism and defense of rationalism. The tight texture of argument makes it difficult to isolate and assess specific aspects of the book in a brief discussion. My goal is to examine the role of experience in BonJour’s conception of a priori justification.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Defense of Pure Reason. [REVIEW]Mylan Engel - 2000 - Dialogue 39 (1):163-166.
Précis of in defense of pure reason. [REVIEW]Laurence Bonjour - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):625–631.
The Fallibility of Rational Insight.Robin Jeshion - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:301-310.
Against Moderate Rationalism.Bruce Aune - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:1-26.
Empiricism, rationalism and the limits of justification. [REVIEW]Tamar Szabó Gendler - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):641–648.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
135 (#164,573)

6 months
22 (#137,424)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Albert Casullo
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

In Defense of Pure Reason.Laurence Bonjour - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):657-663.

Add more references