The frame/content model and syntactic evolution

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):515-516 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The frame/content theory suggests that chewing was tinkered into speaking. A simple extrapolation of this approach suggests that syllable structure may have been tinkered into syntax. That would explain the widely noted parallels between sentence structure and syllable structure, and also the otherwise mysterious pervasiveness of the grammatical distinction between sentences and noun phrases

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Broca's area and language evolution.Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):28-29.
Broca's area and language evolution.Stevan Harnad - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):1-5.
A shrug is not a sentence.Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):215-215.
The Noun Phrase.Anna Szabolcsi - 1992 - In Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin E. Kiss (eds.), The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian. Academic Press.
The Frame/Content theory of evolution of speech.Peter F. MacNeilage & Barbara L. Davis - 2005 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 6 (2):173-199.
The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production.Peter F. MacNeilage - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):499-511.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
31 (#727,171)

6 months
23 (#131,915)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references