Names, and what they are names of

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):69-70 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Terms designating substances and kinds function grammatically much like proper names of individuals. This supports Ruth Millikan's theory, but it also poses the question of how we can understand the reference of kind terms when the ontological status of the kind term is uncertain or disputed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Necessity and rigidly designating kind terms.Ben S. Cordry - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 119 (3):243-264.
Names and natural kind terms.David Braun - 2005 - In Ernie Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 490--515.
Rigidné designátory a referencia.Marián Zouhar - 2001 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 8 (2):150-173.
Understanding proper names.Michael McKinsey - 2010 - Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (4):325-354.
Representation in Early Chinese Philosophy of Language.Chris Fraser - 2021 - Philosophy East and West 71 (1):57-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
61 (#352,261)

6 months
9 (#509,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory Carlson
University of Rochester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references