Conscious thinking: Language or elimination?

Mind and Language 13 (4):457-476 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Do we conduct our conscious propositional thinking in natural language? Or is such language only peripherally related to human conscious thought-processes? In this paper I shall present a partial defence of the former view, by arguing that the only real alternative is eliminativism about conscious propositional thinking. Following some introductory remarks, I shall state the argument for this conclusion, and show how that conclusion can be true. Thereafter I shall defend each of the three main premises in turn

Other Versions

reprint Carruthers, Peter (2005) "Conscious Thinking: Language Or Elimination?". In Carruthers, Peter, Consciousness: Essays From a Higher-Order Perspective, pp. : Oxford University Press UK (2005)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,060

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
352 (#79,932)

6 months
13 (#253,178)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
The Nature of Cognitive Phenomenology.Declan Smithies - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (8):744-754.
Tolerating Sense Variation.Eliot Michaelson & Mark Textor - 2023 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 101 (1):182-196.

View all 28 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references