Guidelines for Peer Review. A Survey of International Practices

&
In Andrea Bonaccorsi (ed.), The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities: Lessons From the Italian Experience. Springer Verlag. pp. 55-69 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The chapter examines the guidelines and recommendations adopted by a number of international institutions in order to manage the peer review process. These guidelines refer to research quality criteria, indicators and metrics, operationalisations, language and translations, format of questionnaire and response sheet, as well as offer suggestions on the choice of referees, their background, expected performance, and ex post performance appraisal.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/978-3-319-68554-0_3

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Survey on Legal Research Monograph Evaluation in Italy.Ginevra Peruginelli, Sebastiano Faro & Tommaso Agnoloni - 2018 - In Andrea Bonaccorsi (ed.), The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities: Lessons From the Italian Experience. Springer Verlag. pp. 211-230.
Peer Review in Social Sciences and Humanities. Addressing the Interpretation of Quality Criteria.Andrea Bonaccorsi - 2018 - In The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities: Lessons From the Italian Experience. Springer Verlag. pp. 71-101.
The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities: Lessons From the Italian Experience.Andrea Bonaccorsi (ed.) - 2018 - Springer Verlag.
Research Quality Evaluation: The Case of Legal Studies.Ginevra Peruginelli & Sebastiano Faro - 2018 - In Andrea Bonaccorsi (ed.), The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities: Lessons From the Italian Experience. Springer Verlag. pp. 103-129.
Research Quality Criteria in the Evaluation of Books.Carla Basili & Luca Lanzillo - 2018 - In Andrea Bonaccorsi (ed.), The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities: Lessons From the Italian Experience. Springer Verlag. pp. 159-184.
Language, Culture and Traversing the Scholarly Evaluation Landscape.Alesia Zuccala - 2018 - In Andrea Bonaccorsi (ed.), The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities: Lessons From the Italian Experience. Springer Verlag. pp. 395-411.
Is the Diffusion of Books in Library Holdings a Reliable Indicator in Research Assessment?Maria Teresa Biagetti, Antonella Iacono & Antonella Trombone - 2018 - In Andrea Bonaccorsi (ed.), The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities: Lessons From the Italian Experience. Springer Verlag. pp. 321-343.
New COPE guidelines on publication process manipulation: why they matter.Jigisha Patel - 2018 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 3 (1).
Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences.Joan M. Eakin & Eric Mykhalovskiy - 2003 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):187-194.
A guide to applying the Good Publication Practice 3 guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region.Hazel Fernandez, Andrew Sakko, Zhigang Ma, Sandeep Kamat, Jose Miguel B. Curameng, Stefanie Chuah, Magdalene Y. S. Chu, Katsuhisa Arai & Blair R. Hesp - 2019 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 4 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-12

Downloads
4 (#1,801,576)

6 months
2 (#1,686,488)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references