Bolzano versus Kant: mathematics as a scientia universalis

Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper discusses some changes in Bolzano's definition of mathematics attested in several quotations from the Beyträge, Wissenschaftslehre and Grössenlehre: is mathematics a theory of forms or a theory of quantities? Several issues that are maintained throughout Bolzano's works are distinguished from others that were accepted in the Beyträge and abandoned in the Grössenlehre. Changes are interpreted as a consequence of the new logical theory of truth introduced in the Wissenschaftslehre, but also as a consequence of the overcome of Kant's terminology, and of the radicalization of Bolzano's anti‐Kantianism. Bolzano's evolution is understood as a coherent move, once the criticism expressed in the Beyträge on the notion of quantity is compared with a different and larger notion of quantity that Bolzano developed already in 1816. This discussion is enriched by the discovery that two unknown texts mentioned by Bolzano in the Beyträge can be identified with works by von Spaun and Vieth respectively. Bolzano's evolution is interpreted as a radicalization of the criticism of the Kantian definition of mathematics and as an effect of Bolzano's unaltered interest in the Leibnizian notion of mathesis universalis. As a conclusion, the author claims that Bolzano never abandoned his original idea of considering mathematics as a scientia universalis, i.e. as the science of quantities in general, and suggests that the question of ideal elements in mathematics, apart from being a main reason for the development of a new logical theory, can also be considered as a main reason for developing a different definition of quantity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bolzano's Notion of Testifying.Carsten Uwe Gieske - 1997 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 53 (1):249-266.
Husserl and Bolzano.Ettore Casari - 2017 - In Stefania Centrone (ed.), Essays on Husserl’s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag.
Bolzano, the Prescient Encyclopedist.Jan Berg - 1997 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 53 (1):13-32.
Etchemendy and Bolzano on Logical Consequence.Paul Rusnock & Mark Burke - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (1):3-29.
From Ordinary Language to Definition in Kant and Bolzano.Waldemar Rohloff - 2012 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 85 (1):131-149.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-03

Downloads
1,322 (#13,041)

6 months
148 (#30,588)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paola Cantù
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophy and Logic in central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski.Peter M. Simons - 1992 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mere possibilities - Bolzano's account of non-actual objects.Benjamin Schnieder - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (4):525-550.
Etchemendy and Bolzano on Logical Consequence.Paul Rusnock & Mark Burke - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (1):3-29.
Das logische An-sich bei Bernard Bolzano.E. Morscher - 1975 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 37 (2):340-341.

View all 7 references / Add more references