- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Darwinism, design, and public education
John Angus Campbell & Stephen C. Meyer (eds.)
East Lansing: Michigan State University Press (2003)
Abstract
Examines intelligent design as a science, a philosophy and a movement for educational reform. Central to all three aspects of ID is its claim that, if science education is to be other than state-sponsored propaganda, a distinction must be drawn between empirical science and materialist philosophy.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Intelligent design theory, religion, and the science curriculum.Warren A. Nord - 2003 - In John Angus Campbell & Stephen C. Meyer (eds.), Darwinism, design, and public education. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. pp. 45--58.
Homology in Biology.Paul Nelson & Jonathan Wells - 2003 - In John Angus Campbell & Stephen C. Meyer (eds.), Darwinism, design, and public education. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
On behalf of the fool.Michael Ruse - 2003 - In John Angus Campbell & Stephen C. Meyer (eds.), Darwinism, design, and public education. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. pp. 475--485.
Should Intelligent Design be Taught in Public School Science Classrooms?Anya Plutynski - 2010 - Science & Education 19 (6-8):779-795.
Only a theory: evolution and the battle for America's soul.Kenneth Raymond Miller - 2008 - New York: Viking Penguin.
Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the Evolution Vs. Intelligent Design Controversy.Roger S. Taylor & Michel Ferrari (eds.) - 2010 - Routledge.
A Scientific and Religious Critique of Intelligent Design.Stephen Matheson - 2009 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 278--289.
There is no place for intelligent design in the philosophy of biology : intelligent design is not science.Francisco J. Ayala - 2009 - In Francisco JoseĢ Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 364--390.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
29 (#778,198)
6 months
4 (#1,255,690)
2009-01-28
Downloads
29 (#778,198)
6 months
4 (#1,255,690)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Imagining the World: The Significance of Religious Worldviews for Science Education.Michael J. Reiss - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (6-7):783-796.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-ls7fw uwo