Can Chatbots Preserve Our Relationships with the Dead?

Journal of the American Philosophical Association (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT Imagine that you are given access to an AI chatbot that compellingly mimics the personality and speech of a deceased loved one. If you start having regular interactions with this “thanabot,” could this new relationship be a continuation of the relationship you had with your loved one? And could a relationship with a thanabot preserve or replicate the value of a close human relationship? To the first question, we argue that a relationship with a thanabot cannot be a true continuation of your relationship with a deceased loved one, though it might support one’s continuing bonds with the dead. To the second question, we argue that, in and of themselves, relationships with thanabots cannot benefit us as much as rewarding and healthy intimate relationships with other humans, though we explain why it is difficult to make reliable comparative generalizations about the instrumental value of these relationships.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-02-11

Downloads
27 (#896,169)

6 months
27 (#124,101)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Stephen M. Campbell
Bentley University
Sven Nyholm
LMU Munich
Pengbo Liu
Bentley University

Citations of this work

Persons and their Digital Replicas.Jurgis Karpus & Anna Strasser - 2025 - Philosophy and Technology 38 (1):1-23.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism.John Danaher - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2023-2049.
Material Beings.Peter Van Inwagen - 1990 - Philosophy 67 (259):126-127.
Grief: A Philosophical Guide.Michael Cholbi - 2021 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references