Why elementary propositions cannot be negative

Philosophical Studies 27 (6):433 - 435 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,641

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Negative elementary propositions.Robert J. Fogelin - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 25 (3):189 - 197.
Robert W. Burch, "A Peircean Reduction Thesis". [REVIEW]Jay Zeman - 1993 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29 (1):101.
Elementary Propositions and Independence.John L. Bell & William Demopoulos - 1996 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 37 (1):112-124.
Language and Logic in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.Daniele Mezzadri - 2013 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 2 (1):57-80.
Wittgenstein's Elementary Propositions.William G. Bywater - 1969 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):360.
The semantics of falsity and negation.Luiz Pereira - 2004 - Manuscrito 27 (1):183-191.
Criss-crossing a Philosophical Landscape.Michael V. Wedin - 1992 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 42 (1):23-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#938,462)

6 months
4 (#1,010,220)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references