Daniel A. Dombrowski: Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response [Book Review]

Heythrop Journal 50 (4):719-721 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00501_21.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,902

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Daniel A. Dombrowski, rethinking the ontological argument: A neoclassical theistic response. [REVIEW]Donald Wayne Viney - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (3):171-172.
Review: Daniel A. Dombrowski: Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. [REVIEW]G. Oppy - 2008 - Mind 117 (467):690-693.
Review of Daniel A. Dombrowski, Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. [REVIEW]Sandra Visser - 2006 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (12).
Daniel Dombrowski. A Platonic Philosophy of Religion: A Process Perspective. State University of New York Press, 2005. / Daniel Dombrowski. Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. Cambridge University Press, 2006. [REVIEW]Nagasawa Yujin - 2009 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):177--181.
Ontološki argument neoklasičnog teizma-Daniel A. Dombrovski: Rethinking the ontological argument: A neoclassical theistic response, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.Drago Đurić - 2010 - Theoria: Beograd 53 (4):125-133.
Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response.William Lane Craig - 2007 - Philosophia Christi 9 (1):229-231.
‘Ontological’ arguments from experience: Daniel A. Dombrowski, Iris Murdoch, and the nature of divine reality.Elizabeth D. Burns - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (4):459-480.
What ontological arguments don’t show.Mylan Engel - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 88 (1):97-114.
The ontological argument in neoclassical context: Reply to Friedman. [REVIEW]George L. Goodwin - 1983 - Erkenntnis 20 (2):219 - 232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
37 (#604,260)

6 months
2 (#1,685,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elizabeth Denise Burns
University of London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references