Some Treatments Over Objection, Not Others, Are Ethically Justifiable When Managing Anorexia Nervosa

American Journal of Bioethics 23 (8):99-101 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ms. Johnson’s case highlights a number of the ethical challenges that can arise when treating anorexia nervosa, including uncertainty about a patient’s decisional capacity, the limitations of treat...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Passion and Decision-Making Capacity in Anorexia Nervosa.Louis Christian Charland - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):66-68.
A Misunderstanding Concerning Futility.Tommaso Bruni & Charles Weijer - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (7):59-60.
When the self is contested ground.Tommaso Bruni - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (4):4-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-15

Downloads
30 (#763,638)

6 months
11 (#377,362)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lauren Bunch
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Harm to Self.Joel Feinberg - 1986 - Oxford University Press USA.
Harm to Self.Joel Feinberg & Donald Vandeveer - 1988 - Ethics 98 (3):550-565.

Add more references