Alexy's Thesis of the Necessary Connection between Law and Morality

Ratio Juris 13 (2):133-137 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper criticizes Alexy's argument on the necessary connection between law and morality. First of all, the author discusses some aspects of the notion of the claim to correctness. Basically, it is highly doubtful that all legal authorities share the same idea of moral correctness. Secondly, the author argues that the claim to correctness is not a defining characteristic of the concepts of “legal norm” and “legal system”. Hence, the thesis of a necessary connection between law and morality based on such claim cannot be accepted.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
81 (#260,108)

6 months
6 (#882,325)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The dual nature of law.Robert Alexy - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (2):167-182.
Legal Certainty and Correctness.Robert Alexy - 2015 - Ratio Juris 28 (4):441-451.
Schauer's Anti‐Essentialism.Torben Spaak - 2016 - Ratio Juris 29 (2):182-214.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references