Are pseudo-patient studies justified?

Journal of Medical Ethics 8 (2):65-71 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pseudo-patient studies are studies in which a medical sociologist or anthropologist masquerades as a patient. Medical treatment is sought without revealing that the 'patient' is really a covert research worker. When access has thus been gained to a medical setting--typically a hospital ward--social interaction between medical staff and patients is then observed over a period of days or weeks. Important studies have been carried out in this way of psychiatric treatment and of the care of the terminally-ill. Is the use of the method justified? What ethical problems does its use raise? How do the undoubted advantages of the approach compare with the clear drawbacks and objections which can be made to its use?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can the Development of Practice Guidelines Safeguard Patient Values?Jodi Halpern - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (1):75-81.
Wrong medicine: doctors, patients, and futile treatment.L. J. Schneiderman - 1995 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Edited by Nancy Ann Silbergeld Jecker.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
50 (#453,871)

6 months
2 (#1,342,428)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references