A Note On Lucretius, De Rerum Natura 3.361

Classical Quarterly 64 (1):413-417 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A conjecture made by Lambinus in 1565 proposes replacement of difficilest at 3.361 with desiperest. Although commonly printed until the end of the nineteenth century , in the twentieth century the conjecture fell out of favour, both in editions of the entire De rerum natura and of Book 3; the manuscript reading of difficilest has been kept by editors since 1900: Duff, Bailey, Martin, Kenney, Müller, Smith and Brown. But with this consensus there are problems, and there are several reasons for preferring Lambinus' conjecture

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
14 (#1,287,610)

6 months
8 (#613,944)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex.J. P. Elder & J. Martin - 1956 - American Journal of Philology 77 (2):191.
T. Lucretius Carus de Rerum Natura.G. L. Hendrickson & Richard Heinze - 1897 - American Journal of Philology 18 (4):481.

Add more references