An ecologically-informed ontology for environmental ethics

Biology and Philosophy 12 (1):1-20 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since the inception of their subject as a distinct area of study in philosophy, environmental ethicists have quarreled over the choice of entities with which an environmental ethic should be concerned. A dichotomous ontology has arisen with the ethical atomists, e.g., Singer and Taylor, arguing for moral consideration of individual organisms and the holists, e.g., Rolston and Callicott, focussing on moral consideration of systems. This dichotomous view is ecologically misinformed and should be abandoned. In this paper, I argue that the organization of the natural world, as viewed by some ecologists and evolutionary biologists, is structured on various levels that are not reducible to one another. This hierarchical view, expressed by Salthe and Eldredge, provides the most complete and accurate ontology for environmental ethics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hans Jonas’s Ethic of Responsibility: From Ontology to Ecology.Theresa Morris - 2013 - Albany: State University of New York Press.
Contested frameworks in environmental ethics.Clare Palmer - 2014 - In Ricardo Rozzi, Steward Pickett, Clare Palmer, Juan Armesto & J. Baird Callicott, Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world. Springer. pp. 191-206.
Environ-Moral Realism.John Mizzoni - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28:191-221.
The Land Aesthetic, Holmes Rolston's Insight.Maria José Varandas - 2015 - Environmental Values 24 (2):209-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
79 (#274,326)

6 months
5 (#702,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Hierarchical structures.Stanley N. Salthe - 2012 - Axiomathes 22 (3):355 - 383.
What is Wrong with Extinction?Erik Persson - 2008 - Dissertation, Lund University

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
Creative evolution.Henri Bergson (ed.) - 1937 - New York,: The Modern library.
A matter of individuality.David L. Hull - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (3):335-360.
Creative Evolution.Henri Bergson & Arthur Mitchell - 1911 - International Journal of Ethics 22 (4):467-469.
Individuality and Selection.David L. Hull - 1980 - Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:311-332.

View all 14 references / Add more references