Lottocracy and deliberative accountability

Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (1):40-44 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The comment on Cristina Lafont’s book includes two main points. (1) Minipublics do not necessarily stand in opposition to political theories that justify electoral democracy and participatory conceptions of deliberative democracy. In contrast to such a view, I argue that minipublics should be combined with electoral and participatory forms of democracy. (2) A deliberative concept of accountability may overcome some of the shortcomings of the traditional, voluntaristic concepts of democratic accountability.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-28

Downloads
26 (#841,117)

6 months
4 (#1,232,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references