- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Self-correction in science: Meta-analysis, bias and social structure
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 78:93-97 (2019)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Can the Behavioral Sciences Self-correct? A Social Epistemic Study.Felipe Romero - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 60 (C):55-69.
Is meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions a reliable source of evidence for therapeutic decisions?Mariusz Maziarz - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):159-167.
Hobbes and the Democratic Imaginary, written by Holman, Christopher.Cesare Cuttica - 2023 - Hobbes Studies 36 (2):244-251.
Bias as an epistemic notion.Anke Bueter - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):307-315.
David P. Baker and Justin J.W. Powell, Global Mega-Science: Universities, Research Collaborations and Knowledge Production. [REVIEW]Maia Chankseliani - 2024 - Minerva 62 (3):485-489.
Correction to: On the distorted structure of Russian guilt.Artem Serebryakov - 2022 - Studies in East European Thought 74 (4):593-593.
Science and the modern mind.P. W. Bridgman, Philipp Frank & Gerald James Holton (eds.) - 1971 - Freeport, N.Y.,: Books for Libraries Press.
Publish without bias or perish without replications.Rafael Ventura - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 96 (C):10-17.
Cosmological inflation and meta-empirical theory assessment.William J. Wolf - 2024 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 103 (C):146-158.
Meta-empirical confirmation: Addressing three points of criticism.Richard Dawid - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 93 (C):66-71.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-02-10
Downloads
96 (#221,040)
6 months
10 (#430,153)
2019-02-10
Downloads
96 (#221,040)
6 months
10 (#430,153)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis.Felipe Romero - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (11):e12633.
Editorial introduction to “Digital Studies of Digital Science”.Charles H. Pence & Luca Rivelli - 2022 - Synthese 200:328.
Publish without bias or perish without replications.Rafael Ventura - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 96 (C):10-17.
References found in this work
A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science.Kevin Christopher Elliott - 2017 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Why the Reward Structure of Science Makes Reproducibility Problems Inevitable.Remco Heesen - 2018 - Journal of Philosophy 115 (12):661-674.
Novelty versus Replicability: Virtues and Vices in the Reward System of Science.Felipe Romero - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (5):1031-1043.
Lessons from the vioxx debacle: What the privatization of science can teach us about social epistemology.Justin Biddle - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (1):21 – 39.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-mnmvz uwo