The insolubility proof of the quantum measurement problem

Foundations of Physics 16 (9):857-870 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modern insolubility proofs of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics not only differ in their complexity and degree of generality, but also reveal a lack of agreement concerning the fundamental question of what constitutes such a proof. A systematic reworking of the (incomplete) 1970 Fine theorem is presented, which is intended to go some way toward clarifying the issue

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Erratum.[author unknown] - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (6):1027-1027.
Announcement.[author unknown] - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (1):177-178.
Erratum.[author unknown] - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (6):1023-1025.
Announcements.[author unknown] - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (4):651-653.
Corrigenda.[author unknown] - 2002 - Foundations of Physics 32 (11):1803-1803.
Announcements.[author unknown] - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (3):499-501.
Announcements.[author unknown] - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (1):139-141.
Announcements.[author unknown] - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (5):847-849.
Announcement.[author unknown] - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (11):1735-1736.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
80 (#262,275)

6 months
12 (#299,634)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Harvey Brown
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Collapse theories.Giancarlo Ghirardi - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Quantum propensities.Mauricio Suárez - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (2):418-438.
Quantum Selections, Propensities and the Problem of Measurement.Mauricio Suárez - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):219-255.
Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P.W. Anderson.Stephen L. Adler - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (1):135-142.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

How the laws of physics lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Probability and the interpretation of quantum mechanics.Arthur Fine - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):1-37.
Measurements and Time Reversal in Objective Quantum Theory.F. J. Belinfante - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (2):187-191.
Mutually exclusive and exhaustive quantum states.James L. Park & William Band - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (2):157-172.

Add more references