- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Replies
Economics and Philosophy 23 (1):115-124 (2007)
Abstract
I am extremely grateful to the five commentators for readingmy book and offering such interesting thoughts in reaction. Shortage of space may make my responses seem brusque. But of course they are not meant to be.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Replies. [REVIEW]John Martin Fischer - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):267-278.
Replies. [REVIEW]John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):467-480.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
62 (#345,286)
6 months
5 (#1,059,814)
2009-01-28
Downloads
62 (#345,286)
6 months
5 (#1,059,814)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
On parity and the intuition of neutrality.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2018 - Economics and Philosophy 34 (1):87-108.
Is reasoning responding to reasons?Franziska Poprawe - 2020 - Philosophical Explorations 23 (2):146-159.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-ls7fw uwo